The Original Indictment

CENTRAL INVESTIGATING CHIEF PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE

1066 Budapest VI., Zichy Jenő u. 14.

1368 Budapest 5. Pf. 251.

354-28710, BM:12-990, 354-28-50

The ongoing criminal case against Miklós Hagyó and defendents charged for the damages particularly of a malpractice felony and other offenses.

From the date of arrest 2010 May 14. was arrested, from the date of 2011 February 13. under house arrest, from 2011 June 8. released free:

Miklós H. I. accused

From the date of arrest 2010 February 3., from 2010 February 5 until 2010 June 25, Miklós H. was in a pre-trial detention, since then has been released.

Ernő M. II. accused

From the date of arrest 2010 January 16., from the date of 2010 January 19. Ernő M was under house arrest, from the date of August 13. under residence banned, and then in 2011 June 8. released:

A. … III. accused

With impunity:

Zsolt József B. IV. accused

From the date of arrest 2010 May 14. from 2010 May 17. was under house arrest Zsolt József B., from, May 26. under pre-trial detention, from 2011 June 23. until 2011 August 16. under residence banned, and since then released:

Ottó Viktor L. V. accused

From the date of arrest 2010 May 14. from 2010 May 17. Ottó Viktor L. was under house arrest, from May 26. under pre-trial detention, from September 22. under house arrest, and from October 22. released:

Éva M…-H. VI. accused

With impunity:

Dr. Iván Miklós H… VII. accused

From the date of arrest 2010 February 3., from 2010 February 5. Dr. Iván Miklós H. was under house arrest, from 2010 February 16. under pre-trial detention, from 2010 Marc 16. under house arrest, and from 2010 March 19. released:

Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused

From the date of arrest 2010 Fenruary 3. from 2010. February 5. until 2010. March 25. Miklós Jenő R. was under pre-trial detention, and since then released:

Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused

With impunity:

Ágnes V. X. accused

With impunity:

László József Sz. XI. accused

With impunity:

László M. XII. accused

With impunity:

Dr. Zsuzsanna M. K. XIII. accused

From the date of arrest 2010 January 6., from 2010. January 9. under pre-trial detention, from 2010 April 27 under residence ban, from 2010 May 4. Dr. Zsuzsanna M. K. was under house arrest, from 2010 November 3. under reside ban, and since 2011 May 3. released:

Dr. Eleonóra Sz. XIV. accused

With impunity:

Tünde B. XV. accused

Accused persons of:

Miklós Hagyó I. accused was the parliamentary and City Council representative between the 2006-2010 election cycle, who has been elected as deputy mayor in 2006 December 16. by the Municipal Assembly, in which capacity the capital's public transport supervision also exercised its competence.

Ernő M. II. accused was a supporter of the political and personal confidante, from 2004 his main political advisor of Dr. Gábor Demszky former Mayor of Budapest.

Attila A. III. accused - on the proposal of Miklós Hagyó I. accused - between 2007 January 1.-2008 January 1. was the CEO of capital owned BKV, Budapest, Headquarters VII. District Akácfa street 15-17. Zsolt József B. IV. accused worked for BKV Co. held various senior management positions since 2007 April, then in 2008 Septemer became the Chief Technical Officer, as well as after the departure of III. accused Attila A., between 2008 February 8.- 2008 August 31. was the appointed CEO of BKV. Attila A. III. accused and Zsolt József B. IV. accused as the CEO of BKV had filled a job position, in regards to asset management of BKV.

Ottó Viktor L. V. accused - was the PR and communication assistant in previous election campaigns of Miklós H. I. accused, and then from 2007 January became the communication consultant of the Deputy Major's cabinet. Éva M-H. VI. accused from 2007 February 1. was employed as press officer at the BKV Co. DBR Metro department, then between 2008 February 10-2009 August, along with Miklós H. I. accused, with the mandate of the Deputy Mayor's Cabinet was the PR consultant. While retaining her main job, she carried out her work at the Town Hall, held connection to BKV Co. to verify the company's communication to meet the political interests of Miklós Hagyó I. accused.

Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused worked as the communications director of BKV Co. from 2007 January 7., then from 2007 August, he became the Deputy CEO of Communication and Sales. Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused was the director of the Cabinet Board's press office from 2007 February. Then from 2007 August the Head of the Communication Department, and then from 2008 July became the Head of the PR Division. Ágnes V. X. accused has worked at BKV Co. since 1994, from 2004 the Head of Marketing Department. Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, Tibor Tamás IX. accused and Ágnes V. X. accused in these positions could have binding commitments on behalf of BKV Co., in which their obligation is in regards of asset management of BKV.

László József Sz. XI. accused has worked at BKV Co. since 1987, from 2004 Cabinet Director, from 2007 August the Head of the Corporate Development Division, then as the strategic and organizational director. Dr. Eleonóra Sz. XIV. accused has worket at BKV Co. since 1972, from 2005 as the Director of Human Affairs.

The actions described in this indictment period- the year 2007 and 2008- BKV Co was a company over $100 billion in debts anually, and each fiscal year closed a significant operating loss (during the 2007 the net profit was HUF 16.8 billion, in 2008. It recorded a net income shoing a loss of HUF 5.7 billion). The transport company's activity of a company's own operating costs were not covered, to keep it running every year only by the over 32 billion normative support, and by the more than 17 billion government price subsidies was it possible, and without these subsidies BKV would have collapsed. BKV Co. even with these supports were with great difficulty, and a minimum acceptance level was able to perform basic tasks.

Such financial and economic situations has been described in a series of transactions to be concluded, which BKV's financial position, economic prospects for the core business, failed to improve the quality of services at any level, even if the charge is the subject of a contract by the contracting parties to perform services they wanted. All contracts defining characteristic was that they did not conclude the BKV economic interests in mind, but the defendants and acquaintances, friendships were made for reasons of their income allowance.

In exercising ownership rights over BKV Metropolitan Local Government- Miklós Hagyó I. accused was holding position as the Deputy Mayor, as well as in its Cabitet working with an agency contract Ottó Viktor L. V. accused and Éva M-H. VI. accused, their own or acquaintances of their own financial and economic interests of unlawful promotion between 2007-2009 directly, or accomplices in collaboration with BKV asset management powers to executive officers that were given instructions, and influenced their decisions in a way that they are obliged to trust to a deliberate breach of fiduciary BKV disadvantaged choices and negotiate contracts. Although Miklós Hagyó I. accused of BKV operations management in theory does not have the power, so the leaders of BKV’s specific cases could been ordered, and his function at the Metropolitan Local Government, his political role, due to the weight of the leaders of BKV in the absence of statutory authorization were accepted from or on behalf of him, the daily functioning of BKV instructions.

Miklós Hagyó I. accused activities related to Ernő M. II. accused, who is the official organization of the Municipality still did not have a formal position, and he had no basis for any legal action. It was well-known that he acts as the political adviser of the Mayor of Budapest, therefore, no one doubted, that in the matter of BKV Co. his expressed wishes shall be construed as the Mayor's instructions.

The relevant leaders of BKV- Attila A. III. accused, Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, Zsolt József B. VI. accused, Tibor Tamás Z. XI. accused and Ágnes V. X. accused accepted and fulfilled instructions when it was clear to them, that they are not at the interest of BKV or the capital, but - directly or indirectly - only served the interests of employers and the instruction are clearly detrimental to the BKV Co.

The Metropolitan Municipality owner's exercise its supervisory relationship over BKV, and BKV within the corporate organization under the hierarchical relationships, has the political balance of power and influence based on a coordinated manner. The operating organization has been built up, composed of members from the overhead of the BKV and adversely affecting the financial position of instructions executed without protest, and the implementation of their subordinates in order to take into account.

Founder and undisputed leader of the criminal organization was Miklós Hagyó I. accused former urban management and assets management Deputy Mayor, who from his post due to the influence of being abusive, instructions for adding each offender participated in acts, in addition - the example of his own - an environment developed in which confidential employees Ottó Viktor L. V. accused, Éva M-h. VI. accused and Cabinet of the other members remained unknown, and personal attorney Dr. Iván Miklós H. VII. accused, without the direct involvement of Miklós Hagyó I. accused represented by the interest in the decisions, gave orders, and those to convey to the leaders of BKV.

Miklós H. I. accused had similar influence on Ernő M II. accused, who is the representative of the Mayor, the mayor circles of friends based on economic interests that were mediated - in the form of instruction - to the prevailing CEO of BKV Co. The instructions at BKV Co. were communicated to Attila A. III. accused, Zsolt József B. IV. accused or Miklós Jenő R.VIII. accused, who have taken action to implement them: or themselves have taken the necessary steps or in the company's system. Miklós Jenő R.VIII. accused subaltern Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused and Ágnes V. X. accused were instructed, and at the interest of the criminal organization have implemented the instructions.

Ottó Viktor L. V. accused and Éva M-H. VI. accused as well as Attila A. III. accused and Miklós Jenő R.VIII. accused - taking advantage of their role in the criminal organization - occasionally, by their own choice, recognized higher interest or personal interest and was noticed by the BKV Co. financial transactions that caused their own misfortunate damage.

The criminal organization existed in this form 2007 January to 2008 August until Dr. István Kocsis enters his office as CEO. The criminal organization existed in this form 2007 January to 2008 August until Dr. István Kocsis enters his office as CEO. During this operation it caused over 1.49 billion financial loss for BKV Co.

I/A.

Miklós Hagyó I. accused has considered the munincipal-owned BKV Co., that "as paying" for his personal and political nature of the expenditure, which from the parliamentary or the municipality budget, he wouldn't have the right to finance.

As later detailed in contracts which are mainly difficult to control, performance of the devices can not be measured objectively in terms of communications, embraced by marketing, advertising and consulting which are typical of a political conclusion, friendship, or economic favors and the rational management of each contract and the utility for BKV that ignored aspects which have been created.

The BKV Budapest public transport company is a monopolistic company, its services known to the target audience, in the field of services that the capital's public transport users have no choice, and BKV Co. has no competitors. In light of this, the company in general is popular, and promotion of the services of the company made no substantial benefit. For this reason the expenditure was completely unnecessary.

This conclusion of contracts were redundant, because BKV within its own organization, possessed a time-varying organizational system - with Communications and Marketing Department, which is approx. 30 to 80 employees in increasing numbers, and a significant, annual budget of $ 100 million, subject to the order of tasks described in a separate agreement that could have been performed.

Of the contracts that are concluded of the accused - since it was an effective organizational and operational procedure, except for the CEO, is to conclude contracts of two managerial signatures that were required - frequently used as a signatory involvment of such leading colleagues, who did not participate in the crime, and that they had no knowledge of it.

For Attila A. III. accused, Zsolt József B. IV. accused and Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, almost on a daily basis were required to appear at the Mayor's Office the Cabinet of Miklós H. I. accused, where the conduct of business in accordance with the questions beyond the topic of contracting and other matters as requested in the instructions received or made them accountable of their implementation.

Of the vast majority of contracts that are substantive, Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused fell within the sphere of competence, who had previously worked with and had a good personal connection with the BKV Co. and fictitiously working with Éva M-H. VI. accused, so mainly she recieved the instructions, which are usually transmitted to Attila A. III. accused and Zsolt József B. IV. accused.

Of the Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused subordinates, Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused communications director and then head of department and Ágnes V. X. accused were aware that the instruction entered into contracts were part of the work that was not done, or PR, marketing activities in other parts, studies, surveys and consultations for the BKV are useless, were unnecessary, so that the outputs of formal verification on their part consisted of signing certificates.

Of the conclusion of contracts and the certificate of completion of the accused that benefited from others - involvement of managers - who were not participating in crimes, were not aware of it.

Under this activity contracts detailing the accused committed the following acts:

1) Beside the former Deputy Mayor of the Local Government Municipal Miklós Hagyó I.

accused with an agency contract communications management position, Ottó Viktor V. accused

he followed instruction, and unnecessary contracts were concluded for BKV. Therefore work may

have been carried out by the staff of BKV.

a) The Well Advertising and PR Agency Ltd.:

i. Ágnes V. X. accused and László József Sz. XI. accused in 2006 1st of March, number

22/254/2006 agency contracted by the BKV introduced Combino types of tram to the subject of

full public relations activities.

The fee for the services 49,500,000, - HUF + VAT amount was fixed. The fulfillment in all cases

was confirmed by Ágnes V. X. accused, which is based between the period of 2006 April 4. and

2006 November 6. being adviced and the different PR campaigns cost a total of 59,800,320, - HUF

was paid.The contract was unnecessary, as a significant part of the tasks of the BKV employees

have been met.

ii. Ágnes V. X. accused and László József Sz. XI. accused on the date of 2006 December 1st,

assignment contracts have been concluded - no. 22/1051/2006 December's year-end retail events:

Fabulous Santa 1,960,000, - HUF + VAT fee, Fabulous Christmas 5084500, - HUF + VAT fee,

Tale tram of 3,361,000, - HUF + VAT fee, complete the design and construction of objects.

The fulfilment was confirmed by Ágnes V. X. accused, which is based on the 2006, 28th of

December day total of 12,229,800, - HUF which was paid for unnecessary services.

Despite the earlier dissatisfaction of which László József Sz. XI. accused also voiced in a note,

Ottó Viktor V. accused and Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused and his subordinates were to mediate on

instruction which remained contracted with Well Kft.

Ottó Viktor L. V. accused had interest in order to obtain orders to Well Ltd. at municipality

company, since between the period of 2007 May 2. and 2008 December 19. has been a full-time

employee of the company as a strategic advisor, and during this period a total of 11,279,335 HUF

was paid to him buti t was detected he did not work.

iii. Ágnes V. X. accused and Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused director of communications together, in

2007 February 21., of the period between 2007 March 1. and 2007 December 31. business

contracts have been concluded -no. 22/465/2007, to prepare among 14-18 year olds towards

the campaign against BKV cheating monthly 2,480,000, - HUF + VAT a total of 24,800,000

HUF +VAT fee. The contract for an unknown reason with unchanged content in 2007 March 26

once again concluded, but this time on behalf of BKV the signing person was Attila A. III.

accused CEO. The payments - a total of 29,760,000, - HUF - between 2007 April 5. and 2008

January 21. were held on 13 occasions, because 3 time transfers were not successful.

iv. Ágnes V. X. accused together with the offense of not participating in Bernadett É-B. as the

second co-signer, in 2007 April 2. entrepreneurial contracts concluded no. 22/301/2007

advertising BKV on foreign inspections and competitions registration and related administration

for carrying out the subject of 2.000.000, - HUF + VAT namely 2,400,000, - HUF fee.

Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused before the date of the contract, date of invoice 2007 March 26. by

signing the payroll sheet confirmed the fulfillment, and authorized the payment, the transfer took

place on the same day.

v. Attila A. III. accused with WELL Advertising and PR Agency Ltd. in 2007 September 24.

concluded a enterprise agreement no. 1601/67/2007. in subject of organization and management

of BKV Co.. The service fee 1,562,000, -HUF + VAT was determined.

For the unnecessary service on the day of 2007, December 3. signed certificate on behalf of

Miklós R. has been signed by Ágnes V. X. accused. To pay the bills of 1.874.400,-

HUF, was based on invoice flow number 300707 in 2007, December 27.

b) With Pont Ez Ltd.:

i. Ágnes V. X. accused and László József Sz. XI. accused in 2006 September 28 signed an order

for PR advise no. 2/480/2006. with Pont Ez Ltd. for 400,000 - HUF monthly price. The contract

stated objectives that was to promote the BKV Co., increase their image and be more visible to

the general public, and to say what kind of public-tasks that will be provided. The purposes of the

contract, was completely unnecessary, so it was paid 3,240,000 - HUF which also unnecessarily

burdened the budget deficit of BKV Co.

The contract included 2006, November 1. no. 00185/2006., 2006 December 1. no. 00207/2006.,

2007 January 3. no. 00274/2007., 2007 February 1. no. 00290/2007., 2007 March 1. no.

00314/2007. and 2007 March 26. no. 00317/2007. payment of invoices authorized by Ágnes V.

X. accused in the first case László József Sz. XI. accused countersigning, in other cases, signed

by other managers which can not be ascertained.

In 2007, February 22 in a letter BKV terminated the contract what was concluded in 2006,

September 28. Subsequently, Ottó Viktor L. V. accused said to Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, that

Pont Ez Ltd. must be contracted, that these are the requirements of Miklós H. I. accused and his

range towards companies of municipality-government.

ii. Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, acted in accordance with this instruction, so on

behalf of BKV, CEO Attila A. III. accused concluded a utilization agreement no. 162/245/2007.

in 2007 November 14. with Pont Ez Ltd., the last page of the contract endorsed by

Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused and Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused.

The object of the contract, the ltd. committed to "The BKV was to improve public transport -

possibilities of the positive image, and by means of the press to "draw on study. The study

prepares BKV Co. how to make it better than the current one in the press. This study determined

the extent of at least 30 pages, with completion of 2007. November 15., the value of 2,500,000, -

HUF + VAT.

The company in 2007, November 15. submitted the bill and a certificate of completion of

3,000,000-HUF, according to which the 40-page study on 14th of November 2007 was presented

and accepted. On the payroll sheet Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused confirmed that it can be paid, as

well as the comments stated that the payment was held at the request of Miklós Jenő R. VIII.

accused in 2007, December 18, as evidenced by a transfer certificate.

iii. On behalf of BKV Co.Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused head of the PR department and the acts

of non-participating Péter T. head of logistics, with 14/K-455/2008. agency contract number was

concluded in 2008 September 10. for an indefinite period with Pont Ez Ltd.

The purpose of the contract with the Ltd. and in a biweekly sarcastic journal called Hócipő, was to

publish PR articles and be entitled to a reduction of 50%, if the newspaper and its online version

will publish image enhancing public relations and sponsorship material of BKV in each new issue

until 2009 February 28. The contract includes a detailed completion of the contract and the

invoice method. According to the contract, after a satisfactory performance and invoicing within

60 days, the entrustee pays by wire transfer to trustee a commission fee of 2,500,000, - HUF +

VAT.

According to the invoice submitted in accordance with the amount of 3,000,000 HUF by the Ltd.,

the completion was made in 2009 May 4., the invoice date was 2009 March 2. On the payroll

sheet Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused confirmed that it can be paid, 2009 May 4. as evidenced by a

transfer certificate.

With Pont Ez Ltd.it was concluded that the contract was unnecessary, and so BKV suffered

damages with the paid 12.229.800, - HUF,

c) With Kacu Ltd.:

György T. director and co-owner of Kacu Ltd. was the parliamentary secretary of Miklós H. I.

accused as Member of Parliament between the cycle of 2006-2010. In this capacity, case studies

and analysis of state aid were carried out on the suburban tramway traffic for Miklós H. I.

accused. In recognition of the work done, Ottó Viktor L. V. accused ordered Miklós Jenő R. VIII.

accused to pay the invoice submitted by György T.'s company without a contract under

"communications consulting". The submitted KM No. 232379 invoice by Kacu Ltd. in 2007,

March 28 referring to communication consultancy, invoice dated 2007 Marc 10., has been wired

with the amount 300,000-HUF to Kacku Ltd. The invoice fulfilment and payment was

unnecessary for BKV, and was submitted an confirmed by Attila A. III. accused CEO, and Miklós

Jenő R. VIII. accused.

d) With Citynet Ltd.:

On the instruction of Ottó Viktor L. V. accused - who stipulated that with some kind of task

contract, allocate revenue to Citynet Ltd., Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused between March and

November of 2007, without a contract ordered communication and personal counseling from

Citynet Ltd. Ottó Viktor L. V. accused with a mandate has worked at the company, from 2009,

November and has been his full-time job.

According to the orders, Citynet issued the invoices of 2007, March 28 no. 2007/00276, 2007,

April 20 no. 2007/00347, 2007, July 27 no. 2007/00598 and the 2007, November 23 no.

2007/00850, the basis of which 1,860,000, - HUF was transferred to Citynet Ltd.. The

unnecessary advice and fulfilment of invoices were confirmed by Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused

signature, despite the fact that no work has been done. The payments of invoices were confirmed

by CEO Attila A. III. accused, who also was aware of this fictitious nature of the contract.

e) With Relatív Advertising Agency:

Ottó Viktor L. V. accused and Miklós H. I. accused, instructed Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused to

enter into contracts with Relatív Advertising Agency in reference to their range of interests.

i. Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused and the head of marketing division Ágnes V. X. accused, on

no.22/562/2007 concluded a venture agreement with 2.07 million, - HUF + VAT fee with Relativ

Advertising Agency Ltd. for the website graphic design of www.bkv.hu. The payment of invoice

dated 2007, October 27 was confirmed by signing the compliance sheet by Ágnes V. X. accused.

A total of 2.484.000 million, - HUF payment was made in 2007, December 27. The exaggerated

value and unnecessarily ordered service did not happen.

ii Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused in 2007, July 31. signed an agency contract No. 203/458/2007 with

Relatív Advertising Agency with the amount of 550.000 HUF + VAT, not otherwise specified in

communications consultancy. According to the contract fulfillment, it did not happen. With the

permission of Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused between 2007, October 15 and 2009, July 20 a total of

14,850,000, - HUF was paid.

iii. For the proposal of Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, CEO Attila A. III. accused in 2007 October 1.

signed an agency contract No. 16/47/2007., for a period of four months with Relatív Advertising

Agency Ltd. for the image design, advertising consultancy and finding media sponsors of

Budapest-Bamako Rally of 2008, a total amount of 1,900,000 HUF + VAT /month. Invoices

affordability in each of the four cases has been verify by Tibor Tamás Z. IX.accused, while the

fulfillment has been confirmed by Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused. Completion of contract actually

did not happen. Unnecessary - fictitious - services in four installments - in 2007, December 29.,

2008, February 4., 2008, March 3. and 2008, April 7. - a total of 9,120,000, - HUF was paid.

iv. For the proposal of Ágnes V. X. accused manager of marketing department and Miklós Jenő R.

VIII. accused head of logistics in 2007, October 15. concluded a contract No. 14/K-171/2007 with

Relatív Advertising Agency for the preparation of "creative's" against a bilk campaign for 994,

000 HUF +VAT. The Ltd's invoice dated 2007, October 27. fulfillment of 991,200 HUF has been

certified and approved payment by Ágnes V. X. accused, which has been paid out in 2008, January

7., while the invoice dated in 2007, December 1. of 201,600 HUF has been verified and approved

by Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused and has been paid out in 2008, March 10. Moreover, unnecessary

contract of actual work did not happen, and caused a financial loss of the total 1,192,800, - HUF.

v. For the proposal Ágnes V. X. accused marketing manager and Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, Péter

T. trusteeTechnical Deputy CEO and Katalin V. head of the contractual department in 2006 May

6. signed a entrepreneurial contract no. 14/K-225/2007 with Relatív Advertising Agency Ltd. for

the design and preparation of layout and printing of Codex of Ethics for the amount of 379, 089

HUF + VAT namely 454, 907 HUF. The invoice dated 2008, May 30. has been approved by

Ágnes V. X. accused , and the payment of unnecessary service happened in 2008 August 11.

vi. For the proposal Ágnes V. X. accused marketing manager and Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, Péter

T. trusteeTechnical Deputy CEO and Katalin V. head of the contractual department in 2006 May

6. signed a entrepreneurial contract no. 14/K- 553/2008 Relatív Advertising Agency Ltd. for

designing calendars for the amont of 440,000 HUF +VAT. On the proof of Ágnes V. X.accused

the invoice dated in 2007, January 7. a total of 532, 800 HUF has been paid out in 2009 March 9.

f) With Honeymood Ltd.:

To the instruction of Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused and Ottó Viktor L. V. accused - without a tender - the scope of activities which do not affect BKV, thus unnecessary for the provision of advertising services - in fact an implicit support - concluded a contract with Honeymood Ltd. This is because the underlying aim was that with the ordered film won the support and goodwill of the director's father István Verebes for the company's managers for the prepared riport at the Napkelte (Sunrise) morning TV show. In response to instructions of Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, Ottó Viktor L. V. accused - on behalf of BKV acting jointly with head of communication department, Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused - concluded an agreement in 2007, August 31. with Honeymood Ltd. under the management of András Tóth for the making of feature film titled "1" and its material. In return Honeymood Ltd. for the premiere of the film will hand 20 complimentary tickets to BKV and advertising BKV on their press materials. For the loss-making BKV, this unnecessary service fulfilment of the instruction of Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused confirmed and approved the pay out of invoice no. 0876476 for Honeymood Ltd. Based on this authorization, BKV Account Department in 2007, October wired 3.600.000 - HUF to Honeymood Ltd. to the detriment of BKV causing financial loss of this amount.

g) With Csapó LP.:

Dr. Gábor Csapó was related to professional sports and also had a personal relation with Miklós H. I.accused as well as with Ottó Viktor L. V. accused, and would have liked support for his water polo school. The municipal companies for sponsorship was banned, so Ottó Viktor L. V. accused called Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused to resolve the suppotr with some kind of advertising contract. Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused complying with this, persuaded CEO Attila A. III. accused in 2007, November 26. to conclude a contract with Csapó LP. with a hid business - actually as a support - with advertising media instruments to provide advertising space. The unnecessary and unjustified fulfillment for BKV Co., Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused has been certified and authorized the payment of no. 263929, no. 263924 and no. 263915 invoices to Csapó LP. Under the authorization of BKV Account Department, between the dates of 2008, April 2nd and December 20th, a total of 2,850,000, - HUF has been transferred to Csapó LP.

2) At the Metropolitan Local Government beside former Deputy Mayor Miklós H. I. accused,

instructed by Éva M-H. VI. accused with a communications agency contract in management

positions, the following contracts were concluded:

a) With F.F. V. D. LP.:

i. The instruction forwarded to Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused in command, acting on behalf of BKV

Ágnes V. X. accused and László József Sz. XI. accused in 2007 April 27. concluded a contract

with F.F.V.D. LP. for the 2007, May 27. Children's day central event retention in Budapest, V.

district, Deák Square, as well as the deployment of vehicles Smile Inspectors. Although the

events were held, those were unnecessary for BKV Co. and its normal operation terms. The

fulfilment has been confirmed by Ágnes V. X. accused, and no. 0635293 invoice of F.F.V.D. LP.

has been paid. The Account Department of BKV of the written permission of Miklós Jenő R.

VIII. accused, in 2007, June 5th transferred 10.780.000,- HUF to F.F.V.D. LP.

i. Instructions from Éva M-H. VI. accused, Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused ordered 2 units of

"Starting School" named events from F.F.V.D. LP. in 2007, August 23. The events were held

between 2007, September 3 and 7. The unnecessary fulfilments for BKV, Miklós Jenő R. VIII.

accused and Ágnes V. X. accused were confirmed, as well as the payment of no. 0635300 invoice

of F.F.V.D. LP. BKV Co. on the written permission of the above mentioned names, in 2007,

September 19. transferred a total of 16.548.000,- HUF to F.F.V.D. LP.

ii. Éva M-H. VI. accused during a conversation in 2007 said to Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, that

there will be a Christmas program, which she will organize according to the contract to be

concluded with Sporting Life Media Ltd. Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused was aware that he cannot

refuse the request, but he also knew that a contract for the organization of the event actually will

be received by F.F.V.D. LP.

The Sportlife Media Ltd. and F.F.V.D. LP., prior to the concluded contract with BKV agreed in

2007, October, that F.F.V.D. Lp will work as subcontractors, while Sportlife Media Ltd. for the

use of their name will recieve 8% of the taking amount.

The contract with BKV was concluded in 2007, November 14. at the value of 9, 950,000-HUF +

VAT, the signatory person was CEO Attila A. III. accused. The extraordinary fulfillment of the

proof of payment was approved by Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused as the Deputy CEO. in 2007,

December 12. From the transferred gross of 11,940,000-HUF accordance with the agreement, in

2008, January 8. transferred 11,000,000-HUF to F.F.V.D. LP.

In all three cases, contracts were made solely because László M. XII. accused spouse of Éva M-H.

VI. accused, who desired to get work and well-paid jobs to the company. Éva M-H. VI. accused in

all three cases given instructions through Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused. The events are taking place

at a loss in terms of BKV and was unnecessary and superfluous expenditure constituted.

a) With Vision Consulting Ltd.:

Éva M-H. VI. accused at the request of Deputy Chief Technology Officer Zsolt József B. IV. accused instructed Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused as the manager of PR department, to enter into contracts with Vision Consulting Ltd. in 2008 , January 1. on No. 14/K-26/2008., in which the company has undertaken "Vision-VIP" in electronic form and to be sent daily, weekly and monthly an analysis of a political-economic report.

The provided service of Vision Consulting Ltd. was unnecessary and did not benefit BKV. The company's executives didn't even read the incoming emails. The unnecessary service and unjustified fulfillment, and the payment of invoices Tamás Tibor Z. IX. accused confirmed by the certificate of completion and by the signed certified payroll sheets. During 2008 BKV has paid twelve times invoices containing of 300,000 HUF +VAT, a total of 3,600,000-HUF +VAT, all together 4,320,000-HUF.

b) With Smsystem Ltd.:

In the summer of 2008, Éva M-H. VI. accused in the presence of Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused instructed Zsolt József B. IV. accused, who was then the trustee CEO, that an invitation tender process begin on the topic about season tickets of expectant mothers and mothers with small children, in the amount of 8-10 million HUF to be made for a promotional film with Smsystem Ltd.

Zsolt József B. IV. accused and Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused acting in accordance with the instructions given the order to Smsystem Ltd. of the making of BKV expectant mothers pass the promotional film in the value of 7.950.000-HUF +VAT. The No. 14/V-313/2008. has been signed by Head of Department of Communications Tibor Tamás Z. IX.accused, also together with trustee CEO Zsolt B. IV. accused confirmed the payment. Zsolt József B. IV. accused instructed the 2008, August 26 to receive the invoice No. P0000112 an extraordinary payment of the amount of 9, 540, 000-HUF in 2008, September 1. The film has not been used.

2) Attila A. III. accused acting on behalf of BKV on the date of 2007 January 1. concluded a

contract with S.T. Plussz Ltd. to organize the advertising and PR conversations of the shows of

"Napkelte" and "Napnyugta" (Sunrise and Sunset) for the year 2007. According to the contract the

service fee was determined at 20 million, - HUF + VAT- which is in two parts – and will be paid

in the begining of the year and in the middle of the year. The contract, as described in the parties

420,000 - HUF + VAT / min a PR interview preparation and broadcasting fee has been agreed, it is

established that the contract amount is a total of 47.6 minutes airtime at the corresponding rate, so

that BKV pre-paid the allocated airtime charges, without the need for specific performance. The

contract has been concluded even though, that Attila A. III. accused was aware that from a contract

made back in 2006 there is still a 3.713.000,- HUF that was not used. Neither one took care of the

fact later, nor Attila A. III. accused nor Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused who was responsible for the

field of communication and to whom the Ltd. repeatedly was brought to his attention - according

to the contract, even though there would be no cash back -, that appropriate compensation was to

be made.

3) Attila A. III. accused in 2007 January 10. registered No.14/K-31/2008., otherwise without a

cooperation agreement concluded a contract with ICG Infora Consulting Group Ltd. for BKV Co.

executive development programs and operations of executive coaching. The scope of the contract

within the time of signature spread until 2008, June 30. The remuneration of executive coaching is

40.000, - HUF + VAT / hour, 1 day program for organizing 600.000, - HUF + VAT, 1.5-day

program for 800,000, - HUF + VAT.

Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused and Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused in 2008, August 19. registered No.16/330/2008., otherwise without a cooperation agreement concluded a contract with ICG Infora Consulting Group Ltd. for BKV Co. executive development programs and operations of executive coaching. The scope of the contract within the time of signature spread until 2009, June 30. The remuneration of executive coaching is 40.000, - HUF + VAT / hour, 1 day program for organizing 600.000, - HUF + VAT, 1.5-day program for 800,000, - HUF + VAT.

The coaching was really claimed by Attila A. III. accused and took advantage with the assistance of an old friend of his, Imre S., who has been an employee of the Ltd. The III. accused with the contract provided that the company requested service was to be paid by BKV, as well as other programs which did not become conspicuous by covering the requested service. ICG Infora Consulting Group Ltd. issued a gross total of 7,176,000, - HUF invoice, and on the dates of 2007, February 16. and 2008, December 15 the amount has been paid.

1) Miklós Jenő R VIII. accused and Miklós H. I. accused and with other politicians according to a

reasoned request for proposals and preparation, Attila A. III. accused in 2007, March 14

concluded an agency contract No. 1/383/2007 with GPS Capital Consulting Ltd. for the period of

2007, March 15 and 2007, december 31. The contract stated objectives of the BKV interests of

governmental evaluation and assessment of the improvement of lobbying strategies (situation

analysis, strategic goals and targets, structure of lobbying messages, lobbying effectively

implemented), lobbying and consulting (government relations organization, continuous advisory

services). Pursuant to the contract, a lobbying strategy for a single 5.000.000, - HUF + VAT value,

while lobbying and consultancy monthly 1.800.000, - HUF + VAT fixed fee for the services, as

well as the monthly 30 hours worked overtime 40.000, - HUF + VAT commission fee was fixed.

Of the performance of the tasks specified in the contract BKV- for an unnecessary service - a

total of 27,340,000, - HUF plus VAT, namely 32.808.000,- HUF has been paid. On the proof of

fulfilment Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused the full amount was paid in nine installments between

2007, May 7 and 2008, January 21.

2) Attila A. III. accused - who was aware of the unprepared contract and its needless means - in 2007,

May 9 on number 22/410/2007 gave permission to Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused to act on behalf

of BKV, to conclude a contract with Siteflex Ltd. for a "new website design." Miklós Jenő R. VIII.

accused concluded the contract in 2007 May 7. In the attachment a contract to be concluded until

2007, May 31. in which the parties are expected "fixed-term sale of advertising space ". Of the

4,000,000 - HUF VAT and 800.0, - HUF VAT invoices can be paid and fulfilled.

Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused signed the protocol, while Ágnes V. X. accused of signing the payroll

sheets was confirmed. Based on these No.SF000157/2007., of the above amount an issued

invoice has been paid in the total amount of 5,760,000-HUF in 2007, October 29. Using the

website, cooperation of advertising has never been made, and so the actions were not made by the

accused.

a) Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused and Ágnes V. X. accused in 2007, May 30. concluded a contract No.

22/493/2007 with Suvet Research Market-, Media and Social Research Ltd. for the complete study

campaign against bilk between the 14-18 years old people, for 1,500,000-HUF +VAT, namely

1,800,000-HUF fee.

b) Attila A. III. accused as CEO, Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused and Zsolt József B. IV. acused in 2007,

October 1. No. 14/K-32/2007. concluded a contract - the same content as the previous one -with

Suvet Research Market-, Media and Social Research Ltd. for public research related to the

campaign for 1,500,000-HUF + VAT, namely a 1,800,000-HUF fee.

The unnecessary service and undue fulfilment - which has not been utilized in any way as a result in the company - in both cases confirmed by Miklós Jenő R- VIII. accused, has been paid in 2007, July 5 and 2007, November 15. By request Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, Ágnes V. X. accused concluded a corporate agreement with BÁL-NA Produkció Ltd. 2007, June 11. No. 22/550/2007., in accordance to the contract the duration from 2007, June 29. until September 15., the contractor employees - who holds a travel pass with a photo - get a 30% discount of the entry fee to Gárdony "Sport Beach", as well as for the "Retro Festival 2007" in 2007, July 7 employees (+1) have free entry. As a return, BKV has agreed to contribute with the amount of 500.000-HUF + VAT to the event held in 2007, July 7., as well as a direct appearance in the METRO newspaper Budapest edition, during the contract period placement of flyers about Sport Beach in subway trains, and provide a direct link on www.bkv.hu website. The contract was approved subsequently in 2007, June 22. by Attila A. III. accused. The unnecessary fulfilment and payment of the invoice was confirmed by Ágnes V. X. accused, of the amount of 600,000-HUF, and it has been paid in 2007, September 1.

8) According to one member of the H. Cabinet – an individual remains unknown - whereby

approximately 20 million shall be sent to the company, Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused consent and

notification of Attila A. III. accused, in 2007, June 20. concluded a contract No. 63/V-40/2007.

with Média Magnet Ltd. for eight studies (communication, marketing / media target group

analysis, cable television market, sponsorship, internet, crisis communication, etc.. topics) for a

total of 21,200,000, - HUF + VAT.

The fulfilment was confirmed by Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, Ágnes V. X. accused and Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused - who also were aware that the studies can not be used in the company - on the date of 2007, July 6th 19, 080,000-HUF +VAT and in 2007, November 12. 2,120,000-HUF +VAT all together the amount of 22,440,000 HUF has been paid out.

The studies were unnecessary for BKV, and were not used.

9) Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused and Ágnes V. X.accused concluded a venture contract with Piatnik

Ltd. in 2007, June 30 No. 22/582/2007. for 5000 decks of custom-designed Hungarian cards, 3000

decks of standard rummy cards and 1000 boxes of a 1000 piece puzzle suitable for resale

manufacture for a total of 3,779,000, - HUF + VAT.

The fulfilment of - in the case of the high costs of the unnecessary rummy cards stipulated in the contract - invoices were approved by Ágnes V. X. accused that on the basis of 5,560,718, - HUF of the phase incoming invoices between 2008, February 4 and May 8. has been paid in eight installments.

10) Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused in 2007, July 6 concluded a venture contract No. 63/V-41/2007 with

Marionett Actor Agency, for 800,000 information leaflets about BKV in Budapest to be delivered

to household mailboxes, as well as 100,000 flyers for a one-time delivery of a 60 piece on-site

service for 14,984,000-HUF + VAT.

Marionett Ltd. solved the distribution with a contract with Magyar Posta Co. a total of 3.417.177- HUF + VAT, which was not paid. The No. AN7L-A 135475 invoice, dated on 19th October, 2007 was verified on the payroll sheet signed by Ágnes V. X. accused, and in 2007, December 19 a total of 17,980,800, - HUF was paid.

Marionett Ltd. contributions were unnecessary because the postal distribution of BKV could have done it directly themselves, and therefore caused a financial loss of 14,563,623 -HUF.

11) Gergő C. who was the office manager of Miklós H. I. accused at the Mayor's Office as well as

chairman of MSZP in III. District, introduced Györgyi H. head of Európa PC. and his political

supporter to Miklós H. I. accused. It is also pointed out that the BKV could have assisted

financially to the PC.'s welfare activities.

Miklós jenő R. VIII. accused and Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused - for the known unnecessary service - in 2007, June 7 No. 203/317/2007 concluded a corporation contract with invitations to tender in press applications to carry out on a monthly basis, for the public who uses individual transport to switch to public transportation for a monthly 510,000 per month, - HUF + VAT. Between 2007, June and 2009, April, for payments and invoices the payroll sheets were signed one time by Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, and Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused who confirmed and signed 21 times the unnecessary service for a total of 13,464,000-,HUF.

12) Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused and Ágnes V. X. accused in 2007, May 10 on No. 22/436/2007,

concluded a PR communications consultancy contract for a period of one month with KL

Communications and Service CL. for 1,025,000-,HUF + VAT. At BKV Co. the presented 2

invoices in 2007, July 26 was approved by signing the payroll sheet by Ágnes V. X. accused.

Based on these in 2007, September 3 twice 630,000 -HUF, all together a total of 1,260,000, - HUF

was paid to the account of the LP. No material was found at BKV Co. according to the work, as

there was no work done.

13) By permission and instruction of Attila A. III. accused, (not involved in committing the crime)

Zoltán D. Deputy CEO and Imre K. Manager, in 2007, July 12 concluded a contract which was

modified in 2007, October 3 and which was signed on behalf of BKV by Attila A. III. accused,

with C.C. Soft Ltd. to build a visual passenger information system for "Szentendre suburban

railway" between the stations of Batthyány Square and Békásmegyer. Attila A. III. accused, gave

permission of the contract even though that he was aware that the contractually agreed ordered

work for 85 million HUF + VAT, the company is not able to perform, it does not have the

capacity and technical basics. Since it failed to agree on the purchase of the necessary software

with the securing device makers and operators Austrian company Thales, so that this lack of

connection between the two systems was not possible to establish, therefore, fair and accurate

travel information can not be implemented. The contract in 2007, October 3rd had to be modified

because of the lack of agreement with Thales company, a "home-made" insurance unit had to be

made, but which has subsequently proved that it's not working. The entrepreneurship fee

according to the modified contract rose to 99 million + VAT.

The technical handover procedure in 2007, 30th of November was conducted, however, the effective date of the test run is not completed even to this day. Zsolt József B. IV. accused, having failed this - despite the verbal and in sms threats of the Ltd. - didn't want to sign the certificate of completion. In 2007 late November - early December, Miklós H. I. accused summoned Zsolt József B. IV. accused, and instructed him to arrange the payment before Christmas.

Zsolt József B. IV. accused confirmed the fulfilment of payments by signing the payroll sheet in 2007 December 6th and 10th. Thus the invoice No. CCS000086/2007 issued by C.C. Soft Ltd. of 59.4 million HUF + VAT in 2007 December 13., while the No. CCS000101/2007 invoice of 39.6 million HUF + VAT in 2008, February 12 has been paid. Therefore it caused a 18,800,000 HUF financial loss to BKV Co.

14) Attila A. III. accused concluded a contract with Montana Co. for the period of 2007, August 1 and

2007 December 31 contract No. 14/K-54/2007, for the uninterrupted service organization and

operation online news alert called „Naprakész” (Up to date) for a monthly 504,000 HUF + VAT.

Subject of the contract: construction of the metro on the international market with press

monitoring, internet monitoring by specific related foreign organizations, and applications and

tenders watching.

To conclude the contract was requested by Ferenc O. the Project Manager of DBR Metró, and Deputy CEO at BKV, but Attila A. III. accused didn't want to fulfill it, because he saw no need for such a contract. Then Ernő M. II. accused gave instruction to conclude the contract, for which Attila A. III. accused did not dare to disobey, as with Dr. Ferenc O., with Dr. Gábor D and with Ernő M. II. accused who was known to have a good relationship, and they suggested him to get his job and his position.

The unreasonable fulfillment - having knowledge of it - Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused has been certified and authorized the payment of invoices, for a total of 3,024,000, - HUF that was paid.

Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, who was aware of the circumstances of the previous contract - in 2008 January - does not contain the exact date - extended the contract No. 14/K.-28/2008. also for 504,000-,HUF +VAT.

Completion certificates and the payment of invoices in this instance, Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused authorized, which based on the termination of the contract by June 2008 that 2,419,200 -HUF has been paid. With the unnecessary contract, it caused a 5,443,200 HUF financial loss to BKV Co.

a) Attila A. III. accused concluded a venture contract in 2007 of September for the period until 2008,

October 31- an exact date can not be defined - with ANOVA Education Service LP. whose head

was an old friend of Miklós L. To benefit his friend and his company with revenue, he ordered an

experimental transport program design and implementation under the name " Choose the

Community Transport". The undertaking fee was defined of 15,760,000, - HUF + VAT.

Under this contract, the contractor for each phase - verified by the customer - after completing it was entitled to issue an invoice, delivery schedule defined in this section. Section 1-3's completion deadline was 2008, February 29., section 4th deadline was 2008, October 31. The transfer of documents and studies in phases -2008, February 29, and 2008, October 31. - was determined. Of the first phase the fulfillment of serial number D098961-AC7S invoice was submitted in 2007, November 12., a value of 1,800,000, - HUF + VAT (2,160,000, - HUF). The payment of the invoice and fulfillment was confirmed by Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused, and in 2007, December 7, the bank transfer took place. The fulfillment of phase 2-3, serial number D098977-AC7S invoice has been received in 2008, March 5., and its financial settlement took place in 2008, April 29 of 11,880,000 HUF + VAT, namely 14,256,000 HUF. The fulfillment and payments of invoices has been confirmed also by Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused.

1-3. fulfillment phase, according to the contract - in two parts - a total of 13.680.000, - HUF + VAT for a total of 16,632,000, - HUF will be invoiced and paid. For the optional section 4 delivery, billing and financial settlement has not been made.

a) On the instruction of Attila A. III. accsed with their signature Miklós jenő R. VIII. accused and

Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused in 2007 - the exact date can not be determined - between BKV Co. and

Anova LP. on 203/316/2007 registration No., it has been established that an indefinite agency

contract, in which the company undertook monthly reports, analysis, BKV affected a positive

and negative communication phenomena. According to the contract, the agent for the tasks is

entitled for a fee of 200,000-HUF + VAT/ month.

The unnecessary activity contract for BKV, in the year of 2007: 4,320,000 HUF, in 2008: 17,976,000-HUF, a total of 22,296,000, - HUF paid to Anova LP.

In 2007 August 18. the No. 162/322/2009 agency contract has been modified. Which - unlike the previous conditions - the customer BKV impose additional duties also to be carried out and determined.

17) A member of the H. Cabinet - individual remained unknown - addressed towards Miklós Jenő R.

VIII. accused, made the request that has been forwarded to conclude a framework contract with a

predetermined amount with Zsuzsanna M.K. XIII. accused, who formerly was a member of the

organization of XII. District MSZP led by Miklós H. I. accused.

The contract in 2007, October 1st No. 14/K-l59/2007. for indefinite period CEO Attila A. III. accused concluded with the silent partner of DAM LP. Zsuzsanna M.K. XIII. accused. Subject of the contract was a study about the children and the youth towards corporate communication, namely a campaign against youth bilk, for a monthly 250.000, - HUF + VAT. The contract until the day of cancellation from BKV. 2009, June 15., with the compliance verification of Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused, 4,750,000, - HUF + VAT, a total of 5.7 million HUF has been paid. For the service BKV had no need, and had not used it.

18) Gergő C. who was the office manager of Miklós H. I. accused at the Mayor's Office as well as

chairman of MSZP in III. District, introduced Erika K. a district board member and also a

manager director of Soda Advertising Consulting Ltd to Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, and also

referred to the possibility of supporting the company.

Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, then created a fictitious job for the company, and accordingly prepared the contract. Attila A. III. accused, in 2007, October 8. on No. 14/K-68/2007 concluded an agency contract with Soda Advertising Consulting Ltd., in reference to a study of the small underground positioning into a luxury Metro, for 7500000, -HUF + VAT.

Trustee CEO Zsolt József B. IV. accused, the preparation of Miklós jenő R. VIII. accused, 2008, April 1 concluded a second contract with the Ltd. for a study to be prepared to popularize the chairlift, the cable car and cog railway, for another 7.5 million, - HUF + VAT. The completion certificates were signed by Miklós jenő R. VIII. accused, Ágnes V. X. accused and another who is not participating in the criminal offense, Péter Prím, which in two installments (2007, december 20 and 2008, May 26.) a total of 18,000,000, - HUF was paid.

The studies point of BKV had no value, their quality level was not suitable for any use.

19) Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, the initiative of Attila A. III. accused, in 2007, October 17.

concluded an agency contract with Civertan Lp. No. 14/K-71/2007, for the graphic design and

implementation of 300 set (pack of 600) promotional rummy card, for 869,100 HUF + VAT. The

fulfillment and affordability of the invoice was confirmed by Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused,

which in 2008, January 10. a total of 1,042,920 HUF has been paid. The invoice of the delivery of

the 250 set of French cards dated in 2008, March 7., in respect of the apparently unnecessary

fulfillment and affordability was confirmed by Ágnes V. X. accused in the amount of 354,500

HUF + VAT, a total of 425,400 HUF in 2008 March 25. has been paid. The unnecessary contract

caused a financial loss for BKV a total of 1,468,320 HUF.

20) Of the recommendation of Imre S., Attila A. III. accused, in 2007, November 8 concluded an

agency contract No. 1/1891/2007 with Accord Group Consulting Ltd., for the search and selection

of a human resources manager, to replace Dr. Eleonóra Sz. XIV. accused. The company, the

suitable candidate was selected during a tender process, however, BKV didn't conclude an

employee contract with him to fill the position.

According to the agreement, to the contractor BKV paid 8,129,827 gross, - HUF. The total amount in three installments (2007, November 16, 2008, January 7, and 2008, February 14.) the affordability of the incoming invoices, confirmed by András K. not involved int he criminal offence, and for the unnecessary and unreasonable service for BKV, in three parts, in 2007, November 24., 2008 , January 15 and in March 4. has been paid.

21) In the beginning of 2007, Miklós H. I. accused, had to prepare a report about the investment

related to Metro 4 with a separate budget to the the Budget Committee. Miklós H. I. accused, late

December of 2006 and early January of 2007 instructed CEO Attila A. III. accused, that this

analytical work for him was to be carried out by AAM Co.

Attila A. III. accused for this purpose in 2007 January 24. the amount of 50 million HUF framework contract with AAM Co. for the "Metro4 use this to support the functions project coordination, project management, project administration tasks, as well as quality assurance activities". The company with a short deadline, within eight days had performed the work, which had been used by Miklós H. I. accused during his activities as Deputy Mayor.

For BKV the unnecessary services rendered a total of 50,093,400, - HUF in which BKV was compensated. From the 5.997.600,-HUF dated in 2007, March 5., from the 5.995.800,-HUF dated in March 6., from the 19.665.000,- HUF dated in April 12., from the 8.913.000,-HUF dated in May 3., and from the 9.522.000,- HUF dated in June 6., the issued invoices have been paid between 2007, April 5th and July 5th.

Attila A. III. accused, in 2007, December 22. concluded two additional contracts with AAM Management Information Consulting Co. both for a period of five years:

I./ " In regards to the implementation of priority projects of BKV, preparation, implementation and support of quality assurance experts" as well as:

II./ The Metro Line 4 investment project-related tasks in support of experts.

The contract was a clause that the first contract for the use of annual capacity shall not exceed the total value of 125,000,000. - HUF + VAT, while the second contract

375.000, 000, - HUF + VAT amount or price of the calendar year the12th month were concluded by the end of the month, the five-year allocation would have been a total of 2.5 billion HUF.

Based on the two contracts, the following amounts were paid:

Date of invoice

Invoice No.

net amount

gross amount

2008.02.01.

1410210

10.822.500.-

12.987.000.-

2008.03.14.

1410291

12.110.000.-

14.532.000.-

2008.05.27.

1410409

11.770.000.-

14.124.000.-

2008.05.27.

1410410

11.643.000.-

13.971.600.-

Total: 55.614.600,-HUF

Date of invoice

Invoice No.

net amount

gross amount

2008.02.01.

1410211

28.887.500

34.665.000.-

2008.03.12.

1410282

21.085.000.-

25.302.000.-

2008.06.12.

1410437

2.550.000.-

3.060.000.-

2008.05.05.

1410364

5.275.000.-

6.330.000.-

2008.04.15.

1410346

7.375.000.-

8.550.000.-

Total: 77.907.000-HUF

In the case of contract No. I. the first time Attila A. III. accused implemented, while in other cases Zsolt József B. IV. accused confirmed the fulfillment, while in the case of contract II. Árpád B. who was not involved int he crime, signed.

For the unnecessary contracts by József Zsolt B IV. accused, until the termination of the contract in 2008, April 22., a total of 133,521,600-HUF has been paid to AAM Co.

I/B.

Dr. Iván Miklós H. VII. accused, as a contracted lawyer of BKV, taking advantage of his relation with Miklós H. I. accused - also provided as personal and business legal representative - persuaded CEO Attila A. III. accused, that in 2007, February 1. enter into an unnecessary contract with Optimismo Ltd. to evaluate the photocopiers technical condition. Dr. Iván Miklós H. VII. accused, towards Attila A. III. accused, justified the need for the transaction, that in this way the Mayor's office intends to finance the former CEO unofficial "severance".

Optimismo Ltd. at the conclusion of the contract at the time did not work, did not have any employees, and economic activity was not carried out.

Despite this, Tünde B. XV. accused, the owner-manager of Optimismo Ltd. was signing the contract with BKV Co., and then signed a completion report of the fictional work.

The false certificate of completion Dr. Iván Miklós H. VII. accused, signed it by Attila A. III. accused. Based on the fake certificate of completion and the issued invoice by Tünde B. XV. accused, in 2007, March 19. transferred 19.200.000,-HUF to Optimismo Ltd. Tünde B. XV. accused, at the same day withdrew 18.100.000,- HUF cash, and with that possessed with unknown manner.

I/C.

Ernő M. II. accused, despite the loss function of BKV Co., instructed the asset management company's liability managers, to breach their obligation of asset management, to conclude a contract with PQS-Plural Ltd. for cleaning work, which was relevant that the company itself was not able to carry out the work. Therefore, the PQS-Plural Ltd. representative persuaded Renomé Ltd. who was performing this activity for a long time at BKV Co. to enter into a consortium contract. So on the instruction of Ernő M. II. accused, -earlier the cleaning activities were carried out by several companies - after conducting a public tender in 2008, December 22 the PQS-Plural Ltd. and Renomé Ltd. consortium took over. As a result, the BKV underground utility and open areas, stadiums and office buildings, as well as the cleaning of the traffic center in Szabó Ervin sqare, the cleaning costs compared to the earlier date of 2008, December 22. realized an economically unreasonable higher pricing.

Attila A. III. accused, during his operation as the CEO was aware of the procurement process resulting unreasonable pricing background. Despite this without affecting the conduct of the procurement process, the result of market-oriented development, from the distorted result, for CEO signature in order to withdraw the contract has not made the necessary arrangements. Attila A. III. accused, during his operation as the CEO, the prepared contract has not been signed because of illness and his departure.. Zsolt József B. IV. accused, as the incoming new CEO was also aware of the circumstances of the preparation of the contract, therefore, to sign the contract, he regularly postponed, however openly he did not dare to oppose with the will of Ernő M. II. accused, and the destruction of the contract, the necessary measures in order to have the new invite tenders, did not do so. Zsolt József B. IV. accused, has not informed Dr. István Kocsis about the background of the contract, who followed him as the next CEO, so he signed the contract after taking office, in the knowledge that the formally correct procurement procedure, the contract against the legal, financial and branch leaders raised no objection. Of the above mentioned instruction of Ernő M. II. accused, with the assistance of Attila A. III. accused and Zsolt József B. IV. accused, a consortium signed a contract for cleaning services with a substantial unreasonable higher price for performing, and BKV Co. incurred a 746,443,200, - HUF financial loss.

I/D.

Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused as a sales and communication Deputy CEO, and Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused manager, in violation of the obligation of asset management, based on fictitious time sheets ( in which the signatures originated from at least twelve persons) signed them as a leader, and certified payroll forwarded contributed in -being aware of that at BKV Co. was employed, but from 2008, January 1st, actually was not working - for Éva M.-H. VI. accused, until 2009, September 30. Salary, bonus and other benefit payments had been authorized.

Éva M.-H. VI. accused, - by taking the allocated amounts - at BKV her fictitious employment of more than 24,629,817, - HUF financial loss incurred. Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, charged a total of 10,520,565, - HUF, while Éva M.-H. VI. accused, acting as the direct supervisor, worked by supporting all along Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused, charged 24.629.817-HUF pecuniary disadvantages attributed.

II.

Miklós H. I. accused, as the Municipality of Budapest Property and Asset Management and Deputy Mayor, abusing his official position, in 2008, March instructed Zsolt József B. IV. accused, as well as the trustee CEO of BKV, to give him 15 million HUF/year.

Underlying his claim Miklós H. I. accused, envisaged that if Zsolt József B. IV. accused does not transfer the requested amount, that he will discredit him for the improperly issued certificate of completion with C.C. Soft Ltd. in 2007 December, which was instructed by Miklós H. I. accused. Miklós H. I. accused, of this threat, and it is continuously certified violent, assertive behavior, fears Zsolt József B. IV. accused, who as a result, unfair advantage in allocated in 2008 and 2009 15-15.000.000 -HUF to Miklós H. I. accused.

III.

At BKV Co. after the date of 2007, January, completion of the organizational restructuring of the executive management's position was that the various management levels of the employment contracts will be standardized. Thus were born the so-called management contracts, which the Chief Deputies, Directors and their Deputies have concluded contracts and other leaders, the head of department, including the head of departments.

Terms of content, the dismissal of the management contract, the amount of allowances much higher, not only within the law, but by the content of collective agreements than permitted, as well as open-ended fixed term employment relationships being changed.

This was how in some cases that the top management to staff employment contracts were on a mooring - not only in from the Labour Code, but the Collective Agreement provisions that were unjustifiable in their favor notwithstanding – and that their employment regardless of time, the termination of 12 months' severance pay is granted and kept secret (the content of which is the cause, scope, etc.. unclear) for 3-4 months. In detail:

András K. Head of the Secretariat of the CEO's employment was from 2007, January 5. until 2008 November 18., termination of employment - having regard to the nature of the short period - could not have any benefits. Before leaving the company, Attila A. III. accused, in 2008, January updated his work contract included a 10 months severance pay, and 100 days exemption time. The agreement of the elimination of the employment by mutual agreement was signed by Zsolt József B. IV. accused, acting as trustee CEO. András K. under the agreement with Attila A. III. accused, with the 10 months average salary, 14.262.647,- HUF unlawful allowance, left BKV.

Sándor F. Presidential Senior Adviser employment was from 2008, May 3. until 2009 June 8., termination of employment - having regard to the nature of the short period - could not have any benefits. Zsolt József B. IV. accused, as trustee CEO, in 2008 May 8. updated his work contract including a 12 months severance pay, 4 months of confidentiality money, and 100 days notice period. The agreement of the elimination of the employment by mutual agreement was signed by Dr. István Kocsis as CEO. who halved the previous bargaining agreement compensation with Sándor F. based on the agreement, left BKV with the 6 months average salary, 50 days of discharge time, and 2 months of confidentiality money a total unlawful allowance of 36.132.900,- HUF.

Róbert N. e-ticketing project manager employment was from 2007, April 16. until 2008, June 18., termination of employment - having regard to the nature of the short period - could not have any benefits. The employment contract does not contain any point of severance, under the agreement with Attila A. III. accused, he is entitled for the 10 months average salary and 3 months of confidentiality money. The agreement of the elimination of the employment by mutual agreement was signed by Zsolt József B. IV. accused, and upon the agreement he left BKV with 13 months average salary, a total of 25,125,660, - HUF unlawful allowance.

Norbert T. deputy CFO's employment was from 2007, March 12. until 2008, July 18., termination of employment - having regard to the nature of the short period - could not have any benefits. Attila A. III. accused, in 2007, July 31. updated his work contract including a 7 months severance pay, and 3 months of confidentiality money. The agreement of the elimination of the employment by mutual agreement was signed by Zsolt József B. IV. accused, acting as trustee CEO. Norbert T. under the agreement, left BKV with 10 months average salary, a total of 29.353.100,- HUF unlawful allowance.

László G. deputy Project Director of DBR Metro, employment from 1997, August 1. until 2008, April 10. the date of termination of employment of an appropriate 3-month average salary severance payments he would have had. The agreement of the elimination of the employment by mutual agreement was signed by Attila A. III. accused as the CEO, and left BKV with 17 months average salary, and 100 days exemption time. From the amount was paid, 25.127.077,- HUF which was an unlawful allowance, but was entitled to 3,725,100, -HUF.

Zoltán D. Chief Technical Officer's employment from 1988, September 30. until 2007, December 31. existed. Attila A. III. accused, in 2007, July 31. updated his work contract including a 14 months severance pay, 4 months of confidentiality money and 100 days exemption time. The agreement of the elimination of the employment by mutual agreement was signed Attila A. III. accused as the CEO. Under the agreement, he left the company with 14 months of severance pay, and 4 months equal to average earnings a total of 72,731,753, - HUF. The set 9.684.774,-HUF for the 100 days of exemption time could not be given to Zoltán D, because the contract does not contain such a title, so this was an undue benefit.

The persons named in the above-mentioned had manager contracts with such dismissal "very favorable" conditions had the opportunity to leave BKV, the company is unjustified with additional expenditure and was due to disadvantages.

With these acts Attila A. III. accused, 103.553.258,- HUF, while Zsolt József B. IV. accused, 6.132.900,- HUF damages were caused for BKV.

IV.

Dr. Eleonóra Sz. XIV. accused HR director of BKV, entered into an agreement with CEO Attila A. III. accused, in 2008, January 24, to terminate her employment with a mutual agreement in 2008, December 31. She did this so that the period of notice was recorded in this agreement 2008, March 31, but before the start of 2008 March 25. - in 2008 March 20. a claim based on the right of an early retirement pension, prior to establishment of - other subject to authorization reward by virtue of 16,434,704, - HUF, while by virtue of severance 69.847.492,- HUF, a total of 86,282,196, - HUF was to be paid.

The Central Hungarian Pension Insurance Directorate dated in 2008, March 27. with the decision No. 11- 06997/2008/0011, from the date of 2007, December 6. Dr. Eleonóra Sz. XIV. accused, early retirement pension rights were determined. Given that the Labour Code of 1992. Act XXII. Law § 95 (2) of the basic Regulation after 2008, March 27. Dr. Eleonóra Sz. XIV. accused, could not have redundancy, so - paying particular attention that until 2009, July 27. she was employed with the same position at BKV- concluded that the employment terminate by mutual agreement, the agreement for the purpose of deceiving BKV, payment of the above amounts had to be qualified.

Ottó Viktor L. V. accused, permanently registered with the residence in Budapest, 1182 Gyergyó st. 27. on the first floor, living area used only by him, held 1 piece of 12/76, 2 pieces of 12/70 caliber firearms for hunting Magnum 10, and Nike Type of ammo, which he had previously been taken during a hunt.

The arms and ammunition of the 2004th XXIV. tv. § 3 (1) c) of a total of 3 pieces shotguns ammo ammunition deemed it necessary to obtain and maintain licenses, which the defendants did not have. The ammunition of the investigative authority of the 2010, March 4th that was held for a house search were found and seized.

Facts contained in the indictment, the accused are:

Miklós H. I. prime

168.893.400,- HUF

Ernő M. II. prime

751.886.400,- HUF

Attila A. III. prime

1.382.113.605,- HUF

Zsolt József B. IV. prime

926.036.100,- HUF

Ottó Viktor L. V. prime

152.549.027,- HUF

Éva M.-H. VI. prime

77.757.817,- HUF

dr. Iván Miklós H. VII. prime

19.200.000,-HUF

Miklós Jenő R. VIII. prime

302.393.333,- HUF

Tibor Tamás Z. IX. prime

171.262.617,- HUF

Ágnes V. X. prime

214.706.768,- HUF

László József Sz. XI. prime

86.050.120,- HUF

László M. XII. prime

39.268.000,- HUF

dr. Zsuzsanna M.K. XIII. prime

5.700.000,- HUF

dr. Eleonóra Sz. XTV. prime

86.282.196,- HUF

Tünde B. XV. prime

19.200.000,-HUF

amount of financial loss caused for BKV Co, which were not recovered.

The criminal charges the facts in each of the following types of evidence to prove:

The facts are described.

I accuse

Miklós H. I. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1) of the abutment and (3) c) of the qualifying continued, committed a criminal organization is particularly detrimental to property crime of misappropriation of funds, such as instigator; (1 / A, 14 and 21 cp. - s);
Two counts of the Criminal Code. 250th § (1) conflict of and (2) a) of the qualifying senior official persons committing the crime of bribery (II. cp.)
The Criminal Code. § 225th, conflict the crime of abuse of power (I / A, 14th cp.)
2 counts of the Criminal Code. 323rd § (1) of the conflict and (2) c) of qualifying as an official person committed the crime of extortion (II. cp.)

Ernő M. II. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1) conflict of and (3) d) continue to constitute an organized group committed a significant financial loss caused in particular the crime of misappropriation of funds (I/ S 15 and I / C-cp. s) ;

Attila A. III. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1) conflict of and (3) d), constituting a continued criminal organization, committed particularly significant material detrimental misappropriation crime of such co-perpetrator (I/A. 1. a-e), g), 2. a) 3-9., 14-21., I/B., I/C. és III. a) and c-f) cp.);
3 counts of the Criminal Code. § 276-costing conflict private offense of forgery (I/A. 1. c), 21. and I/B. cp.-s);

Zsolt József B. IV. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1 conflict of and (3) d) continue to constitute an organized group committed a significant financial loss caused in particular the crime of misappropriation of funds, as co-perpetrator (I/A. 2. b-c), 7. b), 14., 18., I/C. and III. a) cp.);
Three counts of the Criminal Code. § 276-costing conflict private offense of forgery (I/A. 2. c), 14. and 18. cp);

Viktor Ottó ? V. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1) conflict of and (3) c) of the qualifying continued, committed a criminal organization is particularly detrimental to property crime of misappropriation of funds, such as instigator; (I/A. 1. a-g) cp.);
of the Criminal Code. 263 / A § (1) conflict of and (4) b) of the qualifying offense of abuse of ammunition (V. cp.)

Éva ?-?. VI. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1 conflict of and (3) c) of the qualifying continued, committed a criminal organization is particularly detrimental to property crime of misappropriation of funds, such as instigator (I/A. 2. a-c) and I/D. cp.);

Dr. Iván Miklós ? VII. accused:

of the Criminal Code. 319th § (1) conflict of and (3) b) of the qualifying criminal organization committed significant financial loss caused by misappropriation crimes as incitement (I / B cp.)

Miklós Jenő ? VIII. accused:

of the Criminal Code. 319th § (1) conflict of and (3) c) of the qualifying continued, committed a criminal organization is particularly detrimental to property crime of misappropriation of funds, as co-perpetrator (I/A. 1. a-g), 2. a), c), 3-13., 15-19) and I/D. cp.);

Tibor Tamás ? IX. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1) conflict of and (3) c) of the qualifying continued criminal organization, committed in a particular financial loss caused misappropriation crime of such co-perpetrator; (I/A. 1. b), e-g), 2. b-c), 4., 9., 12., 15-17. and

. I/D vcp.);

10 counts of continuously committed in part, of the Criminal Code. § 276-costing conflict private offense of forgery (I/A. 1. b) e-g), 2. b), 9., 15., 16. ,17. and I/D. cp.);

Ágnes ? X. acused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1) conflict of and (3) c) of the qualifying continued criminal organization, committed in a particular financial loss caused misappropriation crime of such co-perpetrator (I/A. 1. a), b), e), 2. a), 6-11., 13., 18. és 19. cp.);
11 counts of continuously committed in part, of the Criminal Code. § 276-costing conflict private offense of forgery (I/A. l.a), b), e), 2. a), 6., 8-11., 13., and 18) cp.);

László József ? XI. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1 conflict of and (3) c) of the qualifying asset continuously committed particularly detrimental to the crime of misappropriation of funds, as co-perpetrator (I/A. 1. a-b) and 2. a) cp.);

László ? XII. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1 conflict of (3) b) constitutes a significant financial loss caused continuously by committing the crime of misappropriation of funds, such as complicity (I/A. 2. a) cp.);

Dr. Zsuzsanna M.-K. XIII. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1) conflict of and (3) b) of assets constituting a substantial detrimental to the crime of misappropriation of funds, such as complicity (I/A. 17. cp.);

Dr. Eleonóra Sz. XIV. accused:

The Criminal Code. 318th § (1) conflict of and (6) a) accused particularly of committing fraud (IV. cp.);

Tünde B. XV. accused:

The Criminal Code. 319th § (1) conflict of and (3) b) of assets constituting a substantial detrimental to the crime of misappropriation of funds, such as complicity (I / B cp.)
The Criminal Code. § 276-costing conflict private offense of forgery as accessories in the I / B cp.).

On the conduct of legal proceedings. 16th § (1), e) and On. 17th Of § (1) of the Municipal Tribunal has the power and jurisdiction.

On the prosecution of § 30 (1) and (3) of the Central Investigation

General Prosecutor's Office has the power and jurisdiction.

Report that:

On. 554 / B of § a), b), d) and f) subject of the case is considered to be a priority;
During the investigation - the expert opinion of forensic accountants, judicial documents expert opinion and judicial arms expert’s opinion of forensic expertise, computer expertise and the costs of witnesses - a total of 5,413,818, - HUF criminal charges arose;
Participation in the hearing on the guard. 46th Of § ~ a) of the binding;
Tibor Mihály Bolla, Ingrid Hoffer, Péter István Prím, Bernadett Ébenyi-Borbély, György Tóthfalusi and Dr. Gábor Csapó suspects of the criminal investigation was closed, while Ernő M. II. accused, Attila A. III. accused, Éva H. IV. accused, Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused, Ágnes V. X. accused and Dr. Eleonóra Sz. XIV. accused, against the defendants the investigation was terminated in part;

Dr. Eleonóra Sz., Éva M.-H., Miklós H., Attila A., Miklós Jenő R., Zsolt József B., Tibor Tamás Z., Ágnes V., Ernő M. and Dr. Iván Miklós H. accused individual's assets are subject to coercive measures.

I propose that the Court should:

On. 554 / B of § a), b), d) and f) On the subject of the proceeding. XXVIII / A Proceed according to the rules described in Chapter;
The Criminal Code. 43rd Of § a) of the Miklós H. I. accused, Ernő M. II. accused, Attila A. III. accused, Zsolt József B. IV. accused, Ottó Viktor L. V. accused, Éva M.-H. VI. accused, Dr. Iván Miklós H. VII. accused, Miklós Jenő R. VIII. accused, Tibor Tamás Z. IX. accused, Ágnes V. X. accused, László József Sz. XI. accused, Zsuzsanna M.K. XIII. accused., Dr. Eleonóra Sz. XIV. accused and Tünde B. XV. accused condemn the accused to prison;
The Criminal Code. 89th § (1) and (2) Dr. Zsuzsanna M.K. XIII. and Tünde B. XIV. accused accused in prison for probation suspended;
The Criminal Code. 99th § (1) of the Miklós H. I., Attila A. III., Ottó Viktor L. V., Éva M.-H. VI., Miklós Jenő R. VIII., Tibor Tamás Z. IX., and Dr. Eleonóra Sz. XIV. accused order to punish defendants for time spent in pre-trial detention order included;
Documents seized during the investigation handle as part of the investigative file;
P. 338th Of § / 1 / Pursuant to order the defendants raised during the investigation 5,413,818 - HUF criminal matters pay the costs;

Search form

You are here

The Original Indictment